In Response to Horace Kallen

"In 1915 the sociologist Horace Kallen, a Jewish immigrant, wrote a much-discussed article in The Nation, taking issue with the melting-pot vision of America. He may well be the first to use the term “pluralism” to describe an alternative vision. The article was titled “Democracy versus the Melting Pot.” In it he argued that the “melting pot” ideal is inherently anti-democratic. It collides with America’s foundational principles. After all, one of the freedoms cherished in America is the freedom to be oneself, without erasing the distinctive features of one’s own culture. Kallen saw America’s plurality and its unity in the image of the symphony, not the melting pot. America is a symphony orchestra, sounding not in unison, but in harmony, with all the distinctive tones of our many cultures. He described this as “cultural pluralism.” (Diana Eck, “A New Religious America: Managing Religious Diversity.”)"

I can see the viewpoint of Mr. Kallen, but I think his viewpoint on the melting Pot being un-democratic seems a little unfounded. When I think of the Melting Pot, I think of the fact that the thing that makes an individual distinctly "American" is the fact that there is a giant mixture of geographic and cultural influences in each person, blended together! When each individual American is combined together in one pot, it is the differences that make us American, not the similarities (inherent or otherwise). I look at my family, and I descend predominantly from England, while my wife has Norwegian, Italian, and Irish in her background. Those geographic differences blended together make each one of us American, even though they are not quite the same. The viewpoint that everyone will become American by absorbing the dominant culture does seem anti-democratic, but I think you can work around that without having to abandon the Melting Pot metaphor all together.